| HS Code | 466992 |
| Product Name | MasterFiber M 018 |
| Manufacturer | Master Builders Solutions |
| Material | 100% virgin polypropylene |
| Fiber Type | Monofilament microfiber |
| Fiber Length | 18 mm |
| Specific Gravity | 0.91 |
| Tensile Strength | 500 MPa |
| Elastic Modulus | 3500 MPa |
| Melting Point | 160 °C |
| Ignition Point | 590 °C |
| Alkali Resistance | Excellent |
| Acid Resistance | Excellent |
| Water Absorption | Nil |
| Corrosion | Non-corrosive |
| Recommended Dosage | 0.6 kg/m³ |
| Color | Natural white |
| Packaging | 0.6 kg bags |
| Shelf Life | Indefinite when stored in dry conditions |
As an accredited MasterFiber M 018 - Polypropylene Monofilament Microfiber factory, we enforce strict quality protocols—every batch undergoes rigorous testing to ensure consistent efficacy and safety standards.
| Packing | MasterFiber M 018 is supplied in 600 g water-soluble bags, with 20 bags per 12 kg carton for convenient dosing. |
| Container Loading (20′ FCL) | 20′ FCL dry container loaded with palletized MasterFiber M 018 polypropylene monofilament microfiber bags, securely stowed, moisture-protected, and fully documented. |
| Shipping | MasterFiber M 018 is a non-hazardous polypropylene monofilament microfiber, not regulated for transport by ADR/RID/IMDG/IATA. Ship in original sealed bags or cartons, palletized and shrink-wrapped. Keep dry, away from ignition sources and extreme heat. Handle with standard PPE; avoid dust generation. No special hazard placards required. |
| Storage | Store MasterFiber M 018 in its original, unopened packaging in a cool, dry, well-ventilated area. Protect from moisture, direct sunlight, excessive heat, and ignition sources. Keep pallets off damp floors; avoid physical damage, punctures, or dust generation. Maintain good housekeeping and first-in, first-out stock rotation. No special temperature control is normally required. Store away from incompatible materials, strong oxidizers, and open flames. |
| Shelf Life | Typically 24 months from manufacture when stored dry in original unopened packaging; protect from moisture and UV. |
| Standard designation | Scope | Measured parameter or classification |
|---|---|---|
| ASTM C1579-21 | Plastic shrinkage cracking in concrete | Crack reduction ratio under forced evaporation |
| ASTM C1581/C1581M-18a | Restrained shrinkage of mortar and concrete | Time to microcrack development |
| EN 14487-1:2022 | Sprayed concrete specification | Wet-mix process and placement requirements |
| EN 14889-2:2006 | Polymer fibres for concrete | Class II fibre conformity under CE marking |
| ASTM C1116/C1116M-10a | Synthetic fibre-reinforced concrete | Type III fibre classification |
Competitive MasterFiber M 018 - Polypropylene Monofilament Microfiber prices that fit your budget—flexible terms and customized quotes for every order.
For samples, pricing, or more information, please contact us at +8618112911328 or mail to sales1@liwei-chem.com.
We will respond to you as soon as possible.
Tel: +8618112911328
Email: sales1@liwei-chem.com
Flexible payment, competitive price, premium service - Inquire now!
MasterFiber M 018 is a polypropylene monofilament microfiber supplied as discrete circular filaments for addition to concrete and mortar. The product is not a fibrillated film fiber, a macro-synthetic structural fiber, or a steel fiber. The numerical suffix 018 is consistent with a nominal filament diameter of 18 µm, while the exact cut length, tensile strength, and dimensional tolerance are stated in the batch certificate of analysis. For specification purposes, the material falls within the Type III synthetic fiber reinforcement category of ASTM C1116/C1116M. Polypropylene fibers in this class typically show a density of 0.90–0.92 g/cm³, a melting range of 160–170 °C, and tensile strength between 300 MPa and 500 MPa. Product-specific values for MasterFiber M 018 should be confirmed from the manufacturer’s technical data sheet before concrete mixture approval.
Field observations from ready-mix and precast operations indicate that monofilament microfibers of this diameter class are most repeatable when added to the aggregate stream before water and cementitious slurry are introduced. Static charge accumulation in pneumatic conveying lines and high-shear addition after polycarboxylate ether dispersants can produce agglomeration. A precast plant using a 2.0 m³ twin-shaft compulsory mixer at 32 rpm recorded no visible agglomerates larger than 5 mm across 40 consecutive batches when the fiber was dry-mixed with aggregate for 45 seconds before slurry introduction. Reversing the sequence produced intermittent fiber balls up to 25 mm diameter in 8 of 20 batches, requiring additional mixing and, in two cases, rejection of the concrete batch for architectural surface work.
The controlling mechanism of an 18 µm monofilament in fresh concrete is physical rather than chemical. At a cut length of 6 mm, the fiber count is approximately 7.2 × 10⁸ fibers per kilogram; at a dosage of 0.9 kg/m³, the calculated fiber count is approximately 6.5 × 10⁸ fibers per cubic meter. This count is orders of magnitude higher than the fiber count delivered by typical macro-synthetic or steel fibers. The high number of individual filaments increases the probability that a growing plastic shrinkage crack will intersect a fiber across the bleed-water channel and redistribute capillary tension before the concrete matrix develops sufficient tensile strength to resist crack opening.
Dispersion quality depends on mixer type, charging sequence, and concrete rheology. In a compulsory pan mixer with a batch volume of 0.75 m³, addition of the microfiber to the coarse aggregate stream produced fewer fiber balls than addition to the cement weigh hopper. Fibers introduced after the high-range water reducer occasionally accumulated at blade tips and formed visible resin agglomerates of 10–30 mm diameter. This failure mode is not a material defect but a batching sequence incompatibility. For ready-mix trucks with 9.1 m³ drum capacity, bag addition during aggregate charging at the plant reduced visible fiber balls to fewer than 1 per m³ of discharged concrete, whereas addition into the cement weigh hopper produced intermittent clumping and required 5–10 minutes of additional mixing to redistribute.
Plastic shrinkage crack control is commonly evaluated under ASTM C1579-21. Independent studies on polypropylene monofilament microfibers of this class report crack area reductions of 40–80% at dosages between 0.6 kg/m³ and 1.8 kg/m³ relative to unreinforced control panels, provided evaporation rate, finishing operations, and substrate restraint are held constant. The fiber remains inert in the alkaline cement pore solution at pH 12.5–13.5 and does not alter cement hydration kinetics. Workability loss measured by ASTM C143/C143M slump typically ranges from 10% to 20% at 1.8 kg/m³. Compensating with additional water without verifying compressive strength under ASTM C39/C39M is not acceptable.
For slab-on-grade, composite steel deck, and non-structural overlay applications, the effective dosage window for MasterFiber M 018 is governed by plastic shrinkage exposure rather than structural load capacity. Common addition rates range from 0.6 kg/m³ to 1.8 kg/m³. At 0.9 kg/m³, the fiber volume fraction is approximately 0.10% by volume. At 3.0 kg/m³, the volume fraction approaches 0.33%, at which point pumpability and finishability require rheology verification. The dosage should not be increased beyond the manufacturer’s recommended range solely to compensate for inadequate curing or severe evaporation conditions.
Batching order is a critical variable. The preferred sequence is to charge approximately 50% of the coarse aggregate, add the fiber, charge the remaining aggregate, and dry-mix for 30–60 seconds before introducing cementitious materials and free water. In truck mixers, the fiber should be added with the aggregate stream at the plant rather than at the jobsite after high-shear mixing has already developed. If pneumatic conveying is used, the line should be grounded and the conveying air velocity kept below 25 m/s to limit static charge accumulation. Condensed moisture on packaging can increase bag-breakage risk in automated dosing systems, but the fiber itself is hydrophobic and absorbs less than 0.1% moisture by mass at 23 °C and 24 h immersion under ASTM D570.
The use of polypropylene microfibers in tunnel linings and high-temperature concrete has been reported to reduce explosive spalling because the fibers melt and create pressure-relief channels. However, published data for MasterFiber M 018 in this specific fire-exposure configuration is limited. Any project-specific spalling claim must be verified under ISO 834-1 or EN 1992-1-2 fire test protocols using the actual concrete mixture and moisture condition.
| Property | Typical range or nominal value | Reference method |
|---|---|---|
| Filament diameter | 18 µm nominal class designation | Supplier optical measurement |
| Cut length | 3–12 mm class range; 6 mm common | ASTM D7508/D7508M |
| Density | 0.90–0.92 g/cm³ | ASTM D792 |
| Tensile strength | 300–500 MPa | ASTM D7508/D7508M fiber test |
| Modulus of elasticity | 3.5–4.5 GPa | Supplier tensile test |
| Melting point | 160–170 °C | ASTM D3418 |
| Water absorption | <0.1% at 23 °C, 24 h | ASTM D570 |
| Calculated fiber count | Approx. 7.2 × 10⁸ fibers/kg at 6 mm length | Geometric calculation from diameter and density |
MasterFiber M 018 is differentiated from fibrillated polypropylene microfibers by its monofilament geometry. Fibrillated fibers are produced as slit and expanded film, yielding a net-like cross-section that requires mechanical working during mixing to break into smaller elements. Monofilament fibers are already individual filaments, so they can provide a more uniform spatial distribution at equivalent dosage, but they are also more sensitive to static charge if added too rapidly into a dry cement-rich environment. The circular cross-section has a lower specific surface area than an opened fibrillated network, which influences the rate of surface wetting and dispersion in low-slump mixtures.
Macro-synthetic fibers differ in both geometry and performance. Typical macro-synthetic fibers have equivalent diameters of 0.3–0.5 mm and lengths of 30–60 mm, yielding aspect ratios of 60–120. They are designed to engage cracks after the concrete has hardened and to provide residual flexural strength under ASTM C1609/C1609M. Microfibers do not provide equivalent post-crack capacity because their short length and low modulus limit crack bridging after matrix fracture. Steel fibers have a density of 7.85 g/cm³ and a modulus near 210 GPa; they contribute to flexural toughness but are susceptible to surface corrosion, increase mixing equipment wear, and reduce pumpability at higher dosages. Polypropylene monofilament microfiber is chemically inert, non-corrosive, and does not alter the air-void system when added at the prescribed dosage.
| Fiber type | Diameter / length | Typical dosage | Primary performance metric | Test standard |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monofilament microfiber | 18 µm / 6 mm class | 0.6–1.8 kg/m³ | Plastic shrinkage crack reduction | ASTM C1579 |
| Fibrillated microfiber | 10–40 µm equivalent / 3–19 mm | 0.6–1.8 kg/m³ | Plastic shrinkage crack reduction | ASTM C1579 |
| Macro-synthetic fiber | 0.3–0.5 mm / 30–60 mm | 3.0–9.0 kg/m³ | Post-crack residual strength | ASTM C1609/C1609M |
| Steel fiber | 0.5–1.0 mm / 25–60 mm | 20–60 kg/m³ | Structural flexural toughness | ASTM C1609/C1609M or EN 14651 |
For specification writers, MasterFiber M 018 may be classified under EN 14889-2 as a polymer fiber for use in concrete, provided the manufacturer’s declaration of performance is available. Compliance with REACH Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 and RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU should be verified through the safety data sheet. Storage should be in original sealed packaging away from temperatures above 50 °C and direct ultraviolet exposure. No pre-drying is required even at relative humidity above 60% because polypropylene is hydrophobic. The fiber does not replace air-entraining admixtures, supplementary cementitious materials, or curing practices, and freeze-thaw resistance should be evaluated under ASTM C666/C666M with the project air-void system intact.
Replacement of steel fibers with MasterFiber M 018 is only valid when the design function is control of plastic shrinkage cracking in a non-structural overlay or slab. The fiber count advantage is substantial. At 0.9 kg/m³, the microfiber count exceeds 6 × 10⁸ filaments per cubic meter. A 25 kg/m³ steel fiber dosage with 0.75 mm diameter and 60 mm length produces approximately 1.2 × 10⁵ fibers per cubic meter. That difference explains why microfibers are effective at suppressing early-age microcracks but ineffective in resisting tensile stresses after the matrix has cracked. Where ASTM C1609/C1609M residual strength values or EN 14651 flexural toughness parameters are specified, substitution without redesign is not permissible.
In a comparable 75 mm thick bonded overlay using a monofilament microfiber of 18 µm diameter, a field trial recorded a slump reduction from 180 mm to 150 mm at 0.9 kg/m³. A polycarboxylate ether high-range water reducer dosage increase of 0.2 L/m³ restored workability without measurable change in 28-day compressive strength under ASTM C39/C39M. Published data for this exact product and overlay configuration is limited, so plant-level verification remains necessary. Surface finishing operations such as troweling can expose or stand up fibers if the concrete is overworked; burnishing should be timed when the surface has sufficient stiffness to embed fibers rather than tear them from the matrix.
Because the product is hydrophobic and inert, it can be used in precast, ready-mix, and shotcrete systems without altering setting time under ASTM C403/C403M. However, it is not a substitute for structural reinforcement, welded wire mesh, or steel fibers in load-bearing applications requiring post-crack residual strength. Resistance to shrinkage cracking under restrained conditions should be verified using ASTM C1579 or ASTM C1581/C1581M, and project-specific exposure conditions should determine the final dosage. The absence of published performance data for a specific concrete mixture does not transfer into a blanket performance guarantee.